Eugene Volokh
dismantles Justice Stevens comment in his dissent in the Vermont campaign finance case "it is quite wrong to equate money and speech" by analogy to abortion, education, lawyering, air travel, and computer power.
Hat Tip:
The Instapundit "Would the Supreme Court uphold a 'spending limit' for abortion?"
Of course not. That's an important right, not something trivial like political speech.
No comments:
Post a Comment