The Side Effects of World Football (Soccer for You Americans)

Updated 8/26/08


That I am a soccer fan should be readily obvious to anyone who has read this blog in the past couple of months since I started blogging more about the world's most popular game. Those who have been reading this blog regularly also know that I write regularly about education. One of my favorite education bloggers is Bill Ferriter, who has recently talked about helping students make connections between their passions. Well, I have taken that to heart and made a connection between my passion and my children's curiousity.

While my family is generally amused at my obsession with soccer(hey it keeps me off the streets), there is a wonderful side effect to the Beautiful Game, geography and the ability to teach geography.

International sporting events are fabulous to provide a means by which you can learn about other nations, where they are located and what makes them unique. Sure, the Olympics are nice, but they last two weeks every two years (Summer and Winter games). Yes, they involve lots of nations, but given the short time span of their existence, it is hard to get really into geography. But soccer, particularly international soccer, is a great geographic toy.

In 2010, the World Cup will be held. I don't care what anyone says about American Football or the Olympics, but the World Cup is the single largest sporting event in the world. The tournament features 32 teams from all over the world and all six continents (there is no penquin team from Antartica), and has, literally, a world-wide audience. But the important thing is that qualifying for the tournament has started this year and you can following the regional qualifying on the soccer news sites. This is where the geography lesson comes in, as during qualifying each and every country in the world, for the most part, has a team (I don't think the Vatican fields a squad) and you can follow where they are and how they are doing.

My oldest daughter (now a first grader) usually won't sit and watch a 90 minute game on TV with me (she does like to go to live games), but she will ask me where some countries are located. So, with World Cup qualifying going on, I have taken the opportunity to have a little geography/history/soccer history lesson with each game the U.S. National Team will play.

For example, the United States Men's National Team will play qualifying group play against Guatamala, Cuba and Trinidad & Tobago. There is your regional geography lesson. The U.S. will probably move to the next round which will feature five more teams from the North American, Central American and Carribean areas. If the U.S. get to the World Cup there are 32 teams in that tournament, with 8 four team groups and all the political, geographic and soccer history that can keep you enthralled for the entire month's tournament.

Aside from the Olympics (which last for two weeks), what other major sporting event lends itself to the betterment of American understanding of the world? That's right, none. Not American Football (Throwball), not hockey, or baseball. Basketball is changing a little with the influx of foreign players to the NBA, but it is not like soccer. In soccer, you can have the stories of Nigeria, Cameroon and Cote D'Ivorie all advancing in the Olympic Tournament. You can have the history of Brazil v. Argentiva, the European/South American rivalry. You get all of that, a geography lesson and wonderful competition all at once.

So the connection offers the opportunity for me to teach my daughter geography, history, some biographies (we are talking about Pele now), and I get to watch soccer for "ecucational purposes" and my wife has less ammunition for smirking at my passion.

Divorce Rates Down

Now that the divorce rate is down, we should be celebrating right? While I think a lower divorce rate is a good thing, I think is is more related to this:

Yet Americans aren't necessarily making better choices about their long-term relationships. Even those who study marriage and work to make it more successful can't decide whether the trend is grounds for celebration or cynicism.

Some experts say relationships are as unstable as ever—and divorces are down primarily because more couples live together without marrying. Other researchers have documented what they call "the divorce divide," contending that divorce rates are indeed falling substantively among college-educated couples but not among less- affluent, less-educated couples.

snip

The number of couples who live together without marrying has increased tenfold since 1960; the marriage rate has dropped by nearly 30 percent in past 25 years; and Americans are waiting about five years longer to marry than they did in 1970.

The decline of divorces is a good thing, but the increase in unmarried cohabitation is not. But when celebrities don't get married, what kind of signal is it providing. Everyone wants to be like their idols, but in this respect, I am not sure that idol worship is such a good idea.