The AP has this story in which McCaskill declared her intention to limit her contributions to the MO campaign to those permitted under federal law.
Commissioners ruled 5-0 that McCaskill can follow Missouri law regarding the campaign debt. The commission's advisory opinion also states that when McCaskill solicits contributions to pay off the state campaign debt, fundraising letters can refer to her as "Sen. McCaskill."Prof. Hasen is right politically, but that won't stop the criticism because Sen. McCaskill can hold twice as many fundraisers and yet stay within the law.
In response to the ruling, Marsh said McCaskill would voluntarily limit herself to contributions of $4,600 from individuals and $10,000 from PACs. McCaskill also would accept up to $4,600 in direct contributions from corporations and unions, which federal law does not permit.
Those are the same federal limits that would apply during a single election cycle. For example, individuals under federal law can contribute up to $2,300 during the primary and an additional $2,300 during the general election.
Richard Hasen, a professor specializing in election law at Loyola Law School in Los Angeles, called McCaskill decision "a smart political move because then she can't be attacked for taking large sums from people trying to buy political influence."
From my perspective this is a smart decision by the FEC and by McCaskill.
No comments:
Post a Comment