Tuesday, April 17, 2007

The Patently Predictable

Michelle Malkin has the predictable NY Times reaction (Hint it involves more abridgments of our Constitutional rights).

The Instapundit has a good roundup of information that is a little less obvious, including this piece about campus security:
Campuses don’t need more security. Although simply reassuring the student body probably will require some beefed up security in the short run, neither Virginia Tech nor any other college campus needs to make any long term commitment on the basis of this shooting. Like most college campuses, Virginia Tech is safe. In 2005, the last year for which data are available, the campus had no murders, forcible thefts, or aggravated assaults. Almost no cities of 25,000, Virginia Tech’s student enrollment, ever have had a year that safe. Despite a single horrific day nothing fundamental has changed.

Virginia Tech already has ample gun control and it didn’t stop the shooting. Although the State of Virginia itself has rather liberal concealed firearms laws, Virginia Tech’s Campus Code of Conduct (See section V.W.) already bans all real firearms, BB guns, and even fencing foils. Other than police and members of the University’s ROTC program, nobody can even possess any weapons on the Virginia Tech campus already. No free country has weapons laws as severe as Virginia Tech’s.
Previously the Instapundit had noted that one of his readers had told him about an effort to allow gun possession on campus was denied by the Virginia General Assembly.

No comments: